OFR Practitioner's Guide Menu

Meeting agenda and measuring success

• Meeting agenda

  

  Successful OFR case reviews depend on thoughtful preparation by the OFR coordinator, beginning a month or two before an OFR case review meeting. A list of coordinator activities and a timeline is provided along with the Coordinator’s Meeting Preparation Checklist provided in Module 2.

  Opening remarks and introduction

  Goals and ground rules

  Confidentiality

  Case presentation

  Member report-outs

  Group discussion

  Case and timeline summarized

  Formulate recommendations

  Summarize and adjourn

  Opening remarks and introduction

  This step should include member introductions, updates from previous meetings, upcoming events, data presentation, review case selection criteria, and other announcements.

  • Member introductions: Attendees share their names, titles and their agencies’ names and roles in preventing overdose fatalities.
  • Updates from previous meetings: Members share status updates on any delegated action items or recommendations from previous meetings.
  • Data presentation: At the beginning of the year, present an overview of the prior year’s fatal and nonfatal overdose deaths. At each subsequent meeting, present the year-to-date number of overdose fatalities and any noticeable trends (e.g., changes by overall numbers, demographics, or substance type). Understanding overdose fatalities (e.g., who is at risk for an overdose and where overdose deaths are happening) requires an ongoing and real-time analysis of overdose trends. Using a standard report will help partners understand long-term trends in fatalities and allow them to plan and develop new strategies or modify existing ones. Data and analysis from these reports can also be invaluable for promoting public awareness and outreach, as well as for applying for grant funding. A sample summary data report is included in Appendix B. Also, refer to the CDC Foundation’s PHAST for more guidance about presenting data at an OFR meeting.
  • Review case selection criteria: If not all overdose deaths within a jurisdiction are being reviewed, remind the review committee about which criteria were used to select the case

  Goals and ground rules

  The facilitator reads aloud the meeting goal(s), guiding principles, and ground rules included on the agenda handout. Ask participants whether they want to add any new ground rules.

  • A sample list of ground rules is included in Appendix B.
  • Guiding principles listed in Section 3B.

  Confidentiality

  The facilitator or coordinator collects members’ reviewed and signed confidentiality forms and answers any related questions. Confidentiality is discussed in more detail in Module 4. Collect Your OFR Data.

  • Confidentiality agreement: This essential form needs to be signed at the beginning of each review by the members present. A sample confidentiality agreement is included in Appendix D.
  • If more than one case is reviewed at a meeting and some members arrive mid-meeting, the facilitator needs to make sure that they sign and submit the confidentiality agreement when they arrive.
  • Interagency agreement: This agreement needs to be signed by senior leadership of each participating agency (including any ad hoc agencies) before they participate in any reviews. The agreement states the role of the agency in the reviews. A sample interagency data sharing agreement is included in Appendix D.
  • The facilitator is responsible for reminding team members that the meeting is closed and that the information shared in the meeting shall not be discussed outside the meeting, as outlined in the agreements they have signed.

  Case presentation

  The facilitator presents the decedent’s basic case information.

  • The facilitator presents the case summary developed by the coordinator, as outlined in Section 2B. Coordinator’s Activities, Step 6. Summarize Case(s).
  • If each member is given a summary document, all documents should be collected at the end of the meeting.

  Member report-outs

  The facilitator calls on each member to share what he or she knows about the decedent, his or her social connections, and the overdose incident. The information shared helps members understand more about where the decedent lived, socialized, worked, and played to help identify risk factors and missed opportunities for prevention and intervention that may have contributed to the overdose death.

  The facilitator calls on members to share their summary reports, as discussed in Section 2C. Members’ Activity, Step 4. Prepare a Summary, starting with the medical examiner and first-responder agencies, to report out in reverse chronological order, for assistance with developing an incident timeline. The facilitator will then determine the best approach to receive report outs from the remaining members, based on the specific case.

  Group discussion

  The facilitator actively guides the group discussion by encouraging members to ask questions. The group discussion will clarify timeline of significant life events and identify missed opportunities for prevention and intervention. The facilitator may want to use the strategies outline in Section 3D. Meeting Facilitation Strategies.

  Case and timeline summarized

  The facilitator summarizes significant case information and draws a timeline of key activities, ideally on a whiteboard.

  Formulate recommendations

  The facilitator leads a problem-solving discussion as outlined in Figure 2.1 to identify recommendations for change in practices or policies that may have prevented this overdose death and may prevent those in the future.

  Summarize and adjourn

  The facilitator reviews and clarifies actionable recommendations, assigns individuals responsible for any action items, reflects on the meeting’s process and findings, and collects any participants’ handouts containing case information.

  • The facilitator recaps how the meeting went and relates today’s review to other cases or to a larger context, such as by saying, “Today’s case involved a heroin-laced fentanyl, and there has been an increase in such reported cases in recent months from this area of the city.”
  • The team determines whether the investigation is complete or whether more information is needed.
  • Remind members of confidentiality and collect any papers with confidential information.
  • Remind members of the time and location of the next meeting.